Wealthy bipartisan men increased the chance of democrat’s victory in the 2008 and 2012 elections by protecting the weak republican candidates. Due to lack of John McCain`s political knowledge, he introduced Sarah Palin as his assistant, who is a former sport reporter, and about the recent subject of Ukraine, increases the people`s excitement movement of Ukraine by entering to the mentioned country and giving a lecture there. The result was loss of Crimea, Ukraine’s debt which it was a burden for west and dangerous Russia. Needless to say anything about Mitt Romney, the man with lack of charisma and political knowledge.
What kind of potentials does remain inactive or which potentials are released in the Middle East by American political discourse (whether republican or democrat)?!
How many threats American defensive system can reply actually from five present ones for instance?!
Bipartisan s’ decisive interference in two last elections indicates that they want to change political discourse of White House. (not political function)
The White House political functions depend on many factors, so fundamental political functions of White House are always adopted with Congress as united, but it's independent about political discourse. Although, political discourse is apparently under political pressure of rival party and also public voice, but in contrast, bipartisan` duty is not limited to choosing political discourse and it includes ensuring that.
No comments:
Post a Comment