No law can establish democracy in a country.
Russia and Belarus are among the countries which are democratic only on paper and there is no difference between them and the Arab states of Persian Gulf.
Those who had objected to the laws of the U.S. helped its democracy. It was the protesting votes that have made Blacks eligible to vote. Negative vote or not voting undermines the legitimacy of
the government and it force the federal government to accept real
reforms. There is no benefit in doing changes for the government. So change
happen only when the government has no other choice. Change is the last
option of any government.
Although in the system's view point, Bernie Sanders is a proper candidate to become the next president but it is not yet enough. More is needed; more left and leftists are needed. And until the ideals of tax payers have not been fulfilled, to join the voters campaign can note help them. Those who do not sacrifice their long-term for the short-term will note give confidence vote to the government in order to question the legitimacy of it.
Showing posts with label Democracy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Democracy. Show all posts
Saturday, April 16, 2016
Thursday, July 16, 2015
Revolution.
Civil rights movements and the people's discontent with government is a worthwhile investment for the best democracy to be established. The system certainly needs the voice of people to develop the democracy. And in this regard, entertainer means of communications such as movies and music can increase people's awareness by using their thoughts and lifestyle models.
No revolution will happen in a person-oriented society, even if all people are discontent with their current situation. A revolution in order to be established needs two parameters: first, public discontent and second, public awareness of the fact that all people are discontent and unhappy. The revolution will happen when people of east rely on people of the west, people of west rely on people of east, the people of north rely on people of south and people of south rely on people of the north. And if the residents of east of New York have no awareness of its west residents discontent and vice versa, is a revolution possible in such a situation?!
The cinema and movies can play a role of intermediate. The cinema should be the X-ray in order to reveal the in common points of people.
Given the great financial resources of the system, it is necessary to start the investment in order to run the project long-term and comprehensively.
The "Swordfish" method is allowed to earn more money. Therefore, the security of this method should be fully provided. And at the end, 1 to 2 percent of the revenues from this method are recommended to be donated to charity organizations.
No revolution will happen in a person-oriented society, even if all people are discontent with their current situation. A revolution in order to be established needs two parameters: first, public discontent and second, public awareness of the fact that all people are discontent and unhappy. The revolution will happen when people of east rely on people of the west, people of west rely on people of east, the people of north rely on people of south and people of south rely on people of the north. And if the residents of east of New York have no awareness of its west residents discontent and vice versa, is a revolution possible in such a situation?!
The cinema and movies can play a role of intermediate. The cinema should be the X-ray in order to reveal the in common points of people.
Given the great financial resources of the system, it is necessary to start the investment in order to run the project long-term and comprehensively.
The "Swordfish" method is allowed to earn more money. Therefore, the security of this method should be fully provided. And at the end, 1 to 2 percent of the revenues from this method are recommended to be donated to charity organizations.
Monday, February 9, 2015
US Elections 2016: Illegal Interference
Elections is the last symbol and remainder item of democracy in the U.S. and democracy is the red line of the system. Therefore, any interference in is condemned and will be faced with direct consequences.
Haim Saban and Sheldon Adelson, most recent, design a plan in order to create a negative balance in the 2016 US presidential election. It is worth mentioning that none of them are Israeli committee (also known as Israeli Pyramid's 13) members. Ironically, Sheldon Adelson last efforts have also failed to enter to the committee. He offered to buy PepsiCo but it was rejected. Although, Donald Kendall is a committee member, but it has been a collective decision by the 13 individual members because the offer was not proposed with an economic intent but was implicitly considered membership request. This means that even the Israeli committee does not support them.
Their plan is as follows:
They want to implement the plan by disclosing their nominees before intra-party elections.
No one can support candidates before they are officially declared by the parties including Republicans and Democrats.
The official candidates of the parties are not predictable. Since Joe Biden is interested to participate in the elections!!!
In addition, these two are going to visit Israel together and it should also be stopped.
Haim Saban and Sheldon Adelson, most recent, design a plan in order to create a negative balance in the 2016 US presidential election. It is worth mentioning that none of them are Israeli committee (also known as Israeli Pyramid's 13) members. Ironically, Sheldon Adelson last efforts have also failed to enter to the committee. He offered to buy PepsiCo but it was rejected. Although, Donald Kendall is a committee member, but it has been a collective decision by the 13 individual members because the offer was not proposed with an economic intent but was implicitly considered membership request. This means that even the Israeli committee does not support them.
Their plan is as follows:
They want to implement the plan by disclosing their nominees before intra-party elections.
No one can support candidates before they are officially declared by the parties including Republicans and Democrats.
The official candidates of the parties are not predictable. Since Joe Biden is interested to participate in the elections!!!
In addition, these two are going to visit Israel together and it should also be stopped.
Sunday, December 28, 2014
An Introduction to Elections
Increasing public opinion knowledge has led to the evolution of democracy. In recent years the results of elections in the global setting indicates that the current parameters influencing election are different from old elements affecting this process. In this article, we tried to attend to the candidate's reputation, election atmosphere and media positions in the electoral arena. There is no doubt that the lack of recognition of these elements results in incorrect predictions of future elections results.
The position of candidate's reputation in elections
There are many examples that show that reputation doesn't play a decisive role in the world current elections. For instant, in the recent presidential election in Iran, an unknown politician was elected as President. While competitors of Hassan Rouhani, were of the best-known and most influential Iranian politician. Also we can note to the recent parliamentary election in Ukraine; Yulia Tymoshenko's party unlike most predictions failed to achieve success in the elections. Neither Orange Revolution and nor serving a prison terms brought her success. Finally, in the last presidential election in Romania; even the Romanian unacceptable economy situation did not cause people to elect socialists. All of these indicate that people are looking for people who can trust them. In other words, we can conclude that the behavior of people in the electoral arena is not traditional but it is realistic.
The position of atmosphere in elections
That feeling governing the psychological and spiritual atmosphere of the entire election called "election atmosphere". Elections atmosphere may be emotional or intellectual and may also be peaceful or violent. Events, media, opposition and even the traditions of a society have an important role in shaping the election atmosphere. The candidate or parties who coordinate its electoral discourse to election atmosphere have greater chances of winning than its competitors. In recent Congressional elections in the United States the right-wing tried to impose the two elements of emotions and aggression on the elections atmosphere. In elections, who can choice the elections atmosphere is like a soccer team that have choice between the field and ball. However, it does not matter who sets the atmosphere, but it is important who could handle it better than others. In recent elections, Congressional, the left-wing did not interact with the election's atmosphere and continuous efforts to rationally defend its peaceful positions. Election atmosphere represents the people's demands. The successful candidate is the one who can meet people request. It should be noted that people demand may be in conflict with their real needs. For example, peace is people real need. But, people based on emotionally, and national and etc. reasons may want war. However, choosing the peace or war option only is correct that be according to political interest. So, in the case of conflict between people demand and political interest, it is unreasonable that political interests be sacrificed. In such circumstances, alternatives could be used. For example, if people want peace with all of world, including Russia, promulgation of peace with Cuba can be a good alternative. And if people want a total and ground war in Iraq, a limited war can be partly overcome the people's demand.
The position of Media in elections
Media's role in the regulation of public opinion strongly reduced compared to the past. Analysts and intellectuals wrote a lot of books and articles about mind control by the media. But there is much evidence that shows the current media has no crucial role in the control of public opinion. For example, despite the fact that most of American media as well as American politicians said that democracy in the United States is the world's best model of democracy but very few people take part in the election of America. About two-thirds of eligible voters did not participate in Congress last election. The vote of two thirds of people was "silence".
Most of media and politicians were silence about social discrimination against blacks. But do this neglect led to people silence?!
As a result, people will believe what they feel, not what the media constantly repeat.
The position of candidate's reputation in elections
There are many examples that show that reputation doesn't play a decisive role in the world current elections. For instant, in the recent presidential election in Iran, an unknown politician was elected as President. While competitors of Hassan Rouhani, were of the best-known and most influential Iranian politician. Also we can note to the recent parliamentary election in Ukraine; Yulia Tymoshenko's party unlike most predictions failed to achieve success in the elections. Neither Orange Revolution and nor serving a prison terms brought her success. Finally, in the last presidential election in Romania; even the Romanian unacceptable economy situation did not cause people to elect socialists. All of these indicate that people are looking for people who can trust them. In other words, we can conclude that the behavior of people in the electoral arena is not traditional but it is realistic.
The position of atmosphere in elections
That feeling governing the psychological and spiritual atmosphere of the entire election called "election atmosphere". Elections atmosphere may be emotional or intellectual and may also be peaceful or violent. Events, media, opposition and even the traditions of a society have an important role in shaping the election atmosphere. The candidate or parties who coordinate its electoral discourse to election atmosphere have greater chances of winning than its competitors. In recent Congressional elections in the United States the right-wing tried to impose the two elements of emotions and aggression on the elections atmosphere. In elections, who can choice the elections atmosphere is like a soccer team that have choice between the field and ball. However, it does not matter who sets the atmosphere, but it is important who could handle it better than others. In recent elections, Congressional, the left-wing did not interact with the election's atmosphere and continuous efforts to rationally defend its peaceful positions. Election atmosphere represents the people's demands. The successful candidate is the one who can meet people request. It should be noted that people demand may be in conflict with their real needs. For example, peace is people real need. But, people based on emotionally, and national and etc. reasons may want war. However, choosing the peace or war option only is correct that be according to political interest. So, in the case of conflict between people demand and political interest, it is unreasonable that political interests be sacrificed. In such circumstances, alternatives could be used. For example, if people want peace with all of world, including Russia, promulgation of peace with Cuba can be a good alternative. And if people want a total and ground war in Iraq, a limited war can be partly overcome the people's demand.
The position of Media in elections
Media's role in the regulation of public opinion strongly reduced compared to the past. Analysts and intellectuals wrote a lot of books and articles about mind control by the media. But there is much evidence that shows the current media has no crucial role in the control of public opinion. For example, despite the fact that most of American media as well as American politicians said that democracy in the United States is the world's best model of democracy but very few people take part in the election of America. About two-thirds of eligible voters did not participate in Congress last election. The vote of two thirds of people was "silence".
Most of media and politicians were silence about social discrimination against blacks. But do this neglect led to people silence?!
As a result, people will believe what they feel, not what the media constantly repeat.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)