Russia Needs New Cold War!

The card is placed on the table by Catherine Ashton in her last trip to Iran, causes Russia sees its interests liable in danger in Iran. Also, their analysis shows a sign of concern of Russians from becoming reality the threat of sanctions against this country. Until now, Russians perceived that, gas form Iran rather than Russia`s will be replaced at western countries, in case of sanctions against Russia.
This threat causes Russia sees itself as a defeated in soft war. Russia intends to turn soft war into cold war by stimulating masses of Russians, emphasis on protection of Crimea`s Russian speaking and also sending word with this theme: Russia is in a state of readiness for cold war. Namely, that same action was done after losing out in soft war during the time of former Soviet Union. Russia has some privileges in cold war which misses them in soft war. In a cold war, Russia can easily enforce its militarist policies with protection of Russian`s masses and then create a militarist Fascism, while it can do none of them now. In other hand, Russian government has authorities that United States and European governments don't have. For example, assassinating intellectuals and critics of government is not so controversial in Russia. Even, Anna Politkovskaya who had American citizenship was not safe. While Noam Chomsky can easily publish his own books and teach at universities.
In Russia, a student is fired from university without any explanation only because of “inappropriate manner”, and is this the same in United States or Europe?!
Increasing power of Russian government by decreasing freedom equals to running choice of Russia in cold war. Thus Putin can resort to this new approach for continuance his power under the mask of cold war. But two distinctions can be assumed for United States in a cold war against Russia. First, it will be easier to destruction of Russian Fascism to the outbreak of cold war. In addition, Europeans and Americans haven`t known Russians perfectly yet, Therefore, it's easy to picture for minds which lack of any certain information. Second, White House can charge the president with its political defeats , such as Carter in Iran hostage crisis and another example George W. Bush in regard to attack to Iraq. But, Russian can't do that. Because, when terms of one president of republic is more than twice, so the mentioned president of republic will be symbol of Kremlin. It means that defeat of this president of republic is defeat of Kremlin, and of course not only defeat of the president of republic!
Now let's see, Putin can't be an independent politician.
The proof can be perceived by brief recalling from contemporary history of Russia.
Most of national resources in Russia privatized after Privatization during terms of Yeltsin presidency. But during the time of Soviet Union, few numbers of people piled up great wealth resulting their political corruption, and the rest were not rich and after falling Soviet Union, Russia experienced unpleasant happenings in economic field such as Russian financial crisis. So, winners of privatization in Russia were that few numbers who has called Oligarchy during the time of Soviet Union. They could increase their wealth in that term. In this manner, it is evident that Russian president of republic is needy and dependent to protection of plutocracy in Russia.
But, what is demand of Russian plutocracy?
Approximately, it can be said, their demands aren't very different with ones during the time of Soviet Union.
What will happen if they disappointed from Putin?!
And what will happen if is charged Putin's immature policies with defeat of Kremlin?!

Democratic Totalitarianism in Russia

Putin`s policy in Crimea is serious and disastrous indication of appearing extreme Nationalism as a disease. We`ll perceive that Russian`s policy implementation project is an answer to Russian`s demand, when thousands of Russians protest in support of Kremlin`s policies against Ukraine in Crimea.
Evidently, both Nazism and Fascism had protection of the mass of people, and had Democratic popularity. Thus, Russian Democracy wouldn't be adoptable to the international community, while reinforces the extreme nationalism base.  
Today, Putin`s policies violating international rights has protection of Russian under the care of nationalism. This would be a threat for world peace and constant security. In other words, this would make it onerous to controlling Russia and also balance of powers. Formation of plurality of the Russian nationalists’ thoughts can collapse these thoughts in Russia. This means that a new Russian nationalism thought would be created for competition with current Russian's nationalism thought which to be led by Putin.  
A brief search on Russia`s history presents the individuals and interesting movement for creating a pattern or socio-political model. For example, Decembrist revolt is one of the most adorable Russian's movements. Despite the fact that this movement had deeply Nationalism specifications, yet it had Internationalist specifications, too. Many individuals of the mentioned movement had constructor role in French revolution. Therefore, creating a national opposition that followed by revival of Decembrist dreams, can create a new face of Nationalism. However, the new face is Nationalism; it is west-oriented, too.
Plurality of opinions among Russian Nationalist groups will be the most important achievement of such opposition.
Before, plurality of opinions about Feminism, at the Third-wave Feminism caused to fall of growth and increasing development of this movement.  
The issue is still important in Russia, is that cause Russia to adopt or be influenced by the cultural, economic, or political systems of Europe or westernize it.
But only exporting western thoughts to Russia is not enough. Since, westernization of Russia is demand of its people and also the government. Even Lenin had wanted the same and said with these words: "First, we westernize Russia and then change Europe to Russia".
Putin is trying to achieve the same, Russian dream westernization of Russia, too.
So, if cultural units of American and Europe deny westernize Russia or even debases it, what will change in Russia due to western policy is not evidently dream of Russia.

European Version of the Monroe Doctrine

Events of the Orange Revolution and its fall clearly showed that European Union (EU) doesn't support poor European countries. But currently, Russia sells its gas to Ukraine for half the price of the market. It also frequently feeds the economy of this country by providing financial assistances. There's no doubt that these privileges wouldn't be given to a pro-western government in Ukraine.
But can the EU's supports, replace the Russian supports of Ukraine?!  
Events occurring after the Orange Revolution in Ukraine showed that the EU is reluctant to provide economic supports for a poor European country. Maybe it caused the triumph of the Russian government's pressure politics over Ukraine.  
On the other hand, the events of Greece and the decision making procedure of the EU concerning the economic support of that country showed that the foreign policies of the European Union is closely tied with economy.  
Even right now, it's the US government which is going to send an economic aid package for Ukraine and not the EU.
Certainly the political behavior of the EU regarding Ukraine contains a political message for the white house: The European Union doesn't need poor members or ailing economies such as Ukraine. 
The conflicts of interests of the US and the EU in the affairs of Europe cause the EU's lack of serious supports regarding the US foreign policies in Europe and also regarding Ukraine.
It seems that the implied modern doctrine or the strategy of the EU has replaced the classical doctrine of the white house in the affairs of Europe. According to the EU's implied doctrine, investment in a government is done for the return on investment and not for the goal of winning in a political competition.