...

The system promised to harden presidential contest for Hillary Clinton campaign. Observers can evaluate the performance of the system in this regard and accordingly, adjust their decisions. 
In 2014, the system warned those who always have had influential role in engineering of the US elections that it will disrupt 2016 Presidential election against their plans. The mentioned document is accessible. That warning was not propaganda or a political bluff!
Not only the right to democracy but also further, the right to revolution has been recognized through the United Sates Declaration of Independence. Although the system’s interpretation of the Human Rights might be different with that of the UN Human Rights Council; meanwhile governments guide the Council. 
People are not musical notes to be played for political ambitious of a group. The mainstream media claim neutral and democratic position over people and events. But none of them allow Gary Johnson and Jill Stein, the US presidential candidates, to present their plans, even for a moment. This Presidential election proved to people in the Unites States and the rest of nations, that the mainstream media and Washington are not ready to accept a democratic transition of power to people.

The U.S. Presidential Election: Political Adventure

It is time for truth! 
For the first time in the history of the United States Presidential elections, both leaders of Republicans and Democrats support a single candidate. It is evident that the decision of Republican leaders and the publication of The Washington Post against Trump was a plot and suicidal attack. Given the fact that Donald Trump has never been a powerful candidate, the coalition of the Democratic Party and Republican Party against him has just proved the upper hand and strength of the system in the political games. And the unstable situation of Clinton campaign in the election could force the White House to burn the Mosul card, which was a victory for the system, Iraq and Iran. Well, it is so good to get a golden point without a deal! Of course, the system will not give up on the election. 
A part of truth should be revealed at this point of time since new operations must be carried out in order to insure the security of the world. According to classified information, Clinton’s donors have intended to launch a new war. The potential time is a year after possible presidency of Clinton. Location is Iran and the city of Hamadan is a potential target. The way of implementation of the plan is creating a fake incident, like, September 11 and 2014 Gaza  War. In addition, Hillary Clinton almost knows most of this project.
Luckily, the efforts of the system and certainly, the movement of Sanders' campaign could vanish the popularity of Clinton; the heavy gun of "popularity" lets its owner to simply run ambitious plans. 
So according to the facts, the system and the agents can take their time and ensure the security through purging the mobs and donors and pressing pressure against their family. But their children and pets would be left alone. It is no matter what would be the result of the US Presidential election; the system wins the time!

Keep Calm and Debate

The best teacher is experience! 
First, the winner of a debate is one who can convince audience and there are many techniques for reaching this goal. 
Second, confuse audience by boring and academic lectures when you have no answer or ideal plan. A successful plan is the one that is based on a unique and comprehensive idea. Clinton's economy program has a goal and plan without an ingenious idea and innovative. Franklin Roosevelt and Ronald Reagan both had innovative programs for economy. If Clinton's economy plan was a paper or thesis, no researching and scientific journal and professor would accept it because it had no new and innovative solution for issues. 
Third, a wise person refuses to answer to judgment and comments of his rival. New York Times would not be just or neutral judge for Republicans and so Clinton would not be a neutral judge toward Trump. Clinton's trick could entangle Trump and put him in a defensive position while he could easily clarify this fact that she is against him and has no good faith and then undermine validity of her judgments and information without any struggle! 
Fourth, do not give the audience tens of facts in a limited time because no one can get them all but give them five facts and repeat them tens of times. Trump's facts on economy was too many! 
Fifth, it is more convenient to provide a key sentence for every subject at the beginning of the speech, for instance, "peace is hard but war is easy" would be considered a key sentence for an anti-war lecture. Neither Clinton, nor Trump have used it. 
Sixth, shorten your lecture. It is a technique and Clinton finally did it well after many lectures and books that were tiring for Democrats.