Shock Crisis

Crisis managing is the antidote of a crisis, which might be as a result of a shock unless the shock itself is a crisis. 
A political shock like mass resignation of a group of parliament's representatives can cause a radical but temporary effect against status quo, apart from leading to a political crisis. Crises are manageable but the very temporary radical effects can only be handled by time and patience. Now, if the number of imposing shocks against a state is more than its time capacity, the crisis of shock is formed. Parameters like the economy, population, demographics, culture, etc. determine the time capacity of a state so that an economic downfall of a state could negatively affect its time capacity. 
 It is predictable that the governments would try to resolve the crises due to shocks (such as diplomatic, economic crises, etc.), at the outset. Whereas, the governments would be suffering from lack of time over tackling the consequences and 'temporary radical effects' of the various and numerous shocks. Therefore, they would attempt to buy some time by resorting a kind of radicalism; in short, the good scenario would be something like Roosevelt's New Deal or positive shocks, while the bad scenario can end up with a version of McCarthyism or martial law. Needless to say that Tehran must be the target of this attack.

Democrats: "Omnes pro Uno"

The last living long story was a short story! 
Political parties are not often built on ideologies; parties' ideologies are merely the reflection of their sources or paths of power. 
A typical political party does not fight for the realization of social, national or human rights ideals unless it brings about achievements of political power and financial interests. Such a party is a natural one of its kind so that its door is open for rational negotiation and dealing. But if persons who only care about their political and personal lives and are not interested in the future of the party take its leadership, the party would be derailed. The functions of such a party are just like a "jihadi" element because it would not be sensitive to its natural interests. The Democratic Party is now an example of it. It cannot be overlooked that Obama, Biden, and Clinton are responsible for that. 
The system needs a powerful left-wing party in the country, just as a right-wing one in order to adjust the balance of power and regulate the variables of social movements. Therefore, the party must be safeguarded from being sacrificed for the personal interests of its ringleaders.

Neo-Capital

The Neverland belongs to the nowhere people! 
Culture, law and even force are means to control society but none of them are as powerful as the power of needs. Marxists point to capital and therefore, they have suggested that taking over the whole wealth of a community is translated into controlling them. Thus, the "Revolutionary Marxism" would not be a smart idea for regulating the world order. But how about taking control of the capital flow or capitalists networks?! 
An alternative and secret global financial mechanism must be built by the system, which should be able to offer unique advantages to capital owners. And definitely, their financial exchange would be free from all local and international regulations but the system's code and outlook. In short, there will be no shadow under the system's shadow. 
Needless to say, such a financial system will not be an option to be offered but a necessity of global security, which will take place in one way or another. And there is no doubt that Moscow, Russian oligarchs, and mob groups are among the main threats to the world security and the very financial mechanism must be established in a way to stop major financial exchanges with them as a whole. 
It is the world that can be believed; the one that can be lived!

Iran, Mafia & Sanctions

And when these things begin to come to pass, then look up, and lift up your heads; for your redemption draweth nigh. (Luke 21:28)
The revival of severe sanctions on Tehran will certainly take down the Iranian government in mid or long term. But mob organizations like Iran’s Revolutionary Guard that make lots of money through drug and human trafficking might be survived or even be strengthened in the absence of a powerful government in the country. Also, cryptocurrency plays a significant role in this cycle.
In brief, the sanction will eventually change the balance of power within Iranian regime in favor of Iranian Revolutionary Guard. And it is the end of the game; final confrontation. The ultimate product of the process would be a weak, isolated and aggressive Tehran, like Havana and Caracas with a manageable chance of war.

Proxy Legacies

The terms of 'legacy' and 'history' are just the traps. These are variables that make one vulnerable against controller elements, like propaganda, vogue, ideologies, etc. 
The system is entering a new stage of its existence. The system should be and could be above the history and behind all human's significant legacies. And it is self-evident, as the power is increased, the security requirements are doubled. 
There is no doubt that the system that the personal security of agents will be highly valuable for the security of whole the system. An advanced partitioning or continuous change of partitioning might be effective and practical in this regard. However, 'proxy organizations' would be a natural answer to this level of security necessity. Proxy groups or organizations can carry out the system's missions and operations while they have no access to any valuable resources of the system. So losing them is not more than losing a bunch of money. But due to the different level of internal security and monitoring over agents, crossover must not take place, i.e. a proxy agent cannot become a system's agent and reverse, which shall also be applicable on former agents.

The Greenhouse Misery & the White House

The consequences of the climate change crisis for the democratic countries such as the United States are much more than others. Keep in mind, oppressive or corrupt regimes are not accountable to their nations. Therefore, when their people are surrounded by disasters, they would not enjoy the government support. But what about the United States?! 
It is self-evident that Washington cannot compare itself with Beijing in respect to climate change programs. In addition, according to the World Bank, forced immigration of millions of people would be a notable consequence of the climate change crisis. Nevertheless, this fact has been neglected that the mentioned issue is roughly a product of weak and failed states. It is clear that the West would be a potential victim of a new wave of the refugee crisis. Thus, the U.S. government must gain the leading role in the global arena over climate change to take appreciate measures to mitigate the greenhouse gas emissions. And of course, it is a necessity for national security.

2018 Election: "Hold the Door"

'Trust', is the most determining parameter that its absence forms the essence of politics. 
The behaviors of the White House and a group of Republicans represent the fact that checks and balances is the most convenient means to maintain pressure against Moscow. In addition, the Republican Party should begin the year 2019 without John McCain, Paul Ryan, and Nikki Haley, which means a new beginning for the Party. According to reports, new agenda or procedure of Republicans will be in favor of Kremlin rather than the requirements of national security. 
Thus, it is evident that the system should endeavor to revive checks and balances in order to eliminate the chance of harmful unilateralism. There is no doubt that multilateralism and cooperation with the system is always the best way to tackle the threats and achieve or secure legitimate interests.