The 'Middle East Plus Israel' VS. the Middle East's Israel

For years, the Israeli government has pursued an isolationist policy in its both foreign and domestic affairs. Militarism, extremist nationalism and partially discrimination against Israeli Arabs are among consequences of such an approach. Also, growing anti-Israeli sentiment (and not anti-semitism) in the world and even among educated and academic societies cannot be denied. In short, it is not easy to be an Israeli and live abroad; it is a fact that neither Israeli government nor the world public opinion does care about it. 
Although adopting an isolationist policy could be in harmony with the national security of the country for the early decades of its existence but a revision of the policy in the right time would bring extraordinary benefits for about Israel and the region. 
Israel has lost the previous chance of a safe peace in the 1990s i.e. the peace that would not lead to a secondary conflict carrying out by extremist groups. However, a similar opportunity has already been formed. Today, on the one hand, the so-called "Axis of Resistance" including Tehran, Damascus, Hezbollah, and Hamas are utterly weak and fragile and on the other hand, Riyadh desires a permanent peace between Tel Aviv and Ramallah. Netanyahu is also aware of the fact but his new foreign policy of the 'Middle East plus Israel' is not enough. Today is the day of a great leap for Israel; the time of joining the Middle East family and the moment of the birth of a new Middle East.

Venezuela and Russia: Side Effects

Sometimes a critical situation is not an opportunity but a test of values and commitments. 
Venezuela has been under the influence of sphere of Moscow for over two decades, thus any fundamental change in the state entails decisive will of people or closing a kind of deal with Russians.
Therefore, it should be noted that first, today’s situation of Venezuela and, political and economic instability in the country could be a serious warning to leftist parties in the Latin American states; so that the political weight of this message is way more valuable than the possible fall of the so-called "Bolivarian Republic". Secondly, since the economic body of the country is almost collapsed, its economic reconstruction would be time-consuming, costly and uncertain, so it is not recommended for the White House to risk its face over investment on any of the right-wing party or pro-Washington politician in Venezuela. Thirdly, interfering in the domestic affairs of Venezuela can give an excuse to Kremlin to retaliate, which is against the system’s top priority of security at home.

A Deeper Color

Maybe starting another world war after the first one or a cold war would be inevitable or even further, necessary incidents but not World War II and the Cold War. 
The mentioned wars of the 20th century were due to evading smaller wars by the Western democracies. Emergency measures against Nazi Germany during 1933-1937 might be ended up with war but it could probably prevent the Second World War and its uncountable consequences. It is about the same for the Cold War; the conflict took place very late, given the fact that Stalin's industrialization was almost completed so that the Nazi Germany invasion of the Soviet Union could not stop that. For sure, beating the hero of Brest-Litovsk was easier than taking the Cold War.
After the First World War, the West needed to concentrate on its reconstruction but it cannot be ignored that sometimes it is not buying time but letting a wind to become a tornado. 
Accordingly, every threat, whether internal or external must be neutralized.

Conformists: Death Takes All

For years being conformist has been a secure and comfortable means to get some power without any trouble. They are not dangerous at least until they play by the rules but the fact cannot be ignored that they are loyal to nothing and also do not believe in anything but themselves. Therefore, they are potential threats since they can be forces and fuels of any possible coup while the conformists do not raise any specific objection to anything until then so that they could remain as unknown devils. 
No one claims that the agents of the system intend to forgive the significant sins of human beings as mighty Jesus in order to purify the universe but indeed they are going to wipe out some sinners to clear the very significant sins from the world. 
The history of conformism and the career of all conformists within the system must be considered terminated, though it can gradually be implemented.

Shock Crisis

Crisis managing is the antidote of a crisis, which might be as a result of a shock unless the shock itself is a crisis. 
A political shock like mass resignation of a group of parliament's representatives can cause a radical but temporary effect against status quo, apart from leading to a political crisis. Crises are manageable but the very temporary radical effects can only be handled by time and patience. Now, if the number of imposing shocks against a state is more than its time capacity, the crisis of shock is formed. Parameters like the economy, population, demographics, culture, etc. determine the time capacity of a state so that an economic downfall of a state could negatively affect its time capacity. 
 It is predictable that the governments would try to resolve the crises due to shocks (such as diplomatic, economic crises, etc.), at the outset. Whereas, the governments would be suffering from lack of time over tackling the consequences and 'temporary radical effects' of the various and numerous shocks. Therefore, they would attempt to buy some time by resorting a kind of radicalism; in short, the good scenario would be something like Roosevelt's New Deal or positive shocks, while the bad scenario can end up with a version of McCarthyism or martial law. Needless to say that Tehran must be the target of this attack.

Democrats: "Omnes pro Uno"

The last living long story was a short story! 
Political parties are not often built on ideologies; parties' ideologies are merely the reflection of their sources or paths of power. 
A typical political party does not fight for the realization of social, national or human rights ideals unless it brings about achievements of political power and financial interests. Such a party is a natural one of its kind so that its door is open for rational negotiation and dealing. But if persons who only care about their political and personal lives and are not interested in the future of the party take its leadership, the party would be derailed. The functions of such a party are just like a "jihadi" element because it would not be sensitive to its natural interests. The Democratic Party is now an example of it. It cannot be overlooked that Obama, Biden, and Clinton are responsible for that. 
The system needs a powerful left-wing party in the country, just as a right-wing one in order to adjust the balance of power and regulate the variables of social movements. Therefore, the party must be safeguarded from being sacrificed for the personal interests of its ringleaders.

Neo-Capital

The Neverland belongs to the nowhere people! 
Culture, law and even force are means to control society but none of them are as powerful as the power of needs. Marxists point to capital and therefore, they have suggested that taking over the whole wealth of a community is translated into controlling them. Thus, the "Revolutionary Marxism" would not be a smart idea for regulating the world order. But how about taking control of the capital flow or capitalists networks?! 
An alternative and secret global financial mechanism must be built by the system, which should be able to offer unique advantages to capital owners. And definitely, their financial exchange would be free from all local and international regulations but the system's code and outlook. In short, there will be no shadow under the system's shadow. 
Needless to say, such a financial system will not be an option to be offered but a necessity of global security, which will take place in one way or another. And there is no doubt that Moscow, Russian oligarchs, and mob groups are among the main threats to the world security and the very financial mechanism must be established in a way to stop major financial exchanges with them as a whole. 
It is the world that can be believed; the one that can be lived!