The problem of Syria lies outside of the country and therefore, a Syrian solution cannot settle the Syrian crisis.
Today's Syria is the field of a proxy war, as Lebanon is arena of a proxy dispute with a lower degree than its neighbor, which made it difficult to resolve the Presidential crisis of this country. If the parties engaged in the Syrian crisis are just looking for a short-term victory, so continuation of militarism or attaching the useless option of diplomatic or political solution would be their only dead-end!
But it seems for some States, it has been recognized that continuation of war in Syria could only impose damage against the political credibility of engaged countries in the Syrian civil-war, and moreover that it is a threat to national security of many countries, it is heavy economic burden for State-sponsors of Syrian militants.
Therefore, if the engaged States in the Syrian crisis come to an agreement to end the military and political battle in the country, Syria would enter a new stage. The post-war Syria would be like Vietnam after its second war, which was against United States. The author of Diplomacy book, Henry Kissinger can share his experience in this regard with the US and European governments. Since then, Syrian government needs friends that be able to launch big economic and reconstruction projects in the country. And it can be predicted that Syria would make new friends and find new enemies.
There is no expectation that every State has an interest in planning for long-term but probably those countries, which have designed a long-term strategy for themselves would change the path of war in Syria.
Tuesday, November 29, 2016
Tuesday, November 15, 2016
The Era of Terror-Security
After celebration…
This round of the U.S. Presidential election was a great opportunity for the system to detect covered pro-Russians and sleeper agents. Simply, all of them must be removed immediately. The system must implement the order in all informational, political, economic and cultural fields in the United States.
The result of the election was the consequence of testing capability of the system by Washington.
Without a doubt, the Democratic Party could win the recent Presidential election if they did not intrigue against Sanders campaign or if they cooperate with the system over middle class and people. And certainly winning of Trump, the anti-establishment candidate in both primary and general elections indicated interference of the system against Republican since their decisions through the years were unacceptable in the view point of the system. Of course in the recent years, the White House and Congress did not have a proper relationship with the system and they inevitably paid for it.
The positions of the system over Russia and Iran are considered red lines. Therefore, Donald Trump is requested to avoid withdrawing against Moscow, and also, stop animosity to Iran. Donald Trump is asked by the system to put an end to the Washington interference in the domestic affairs of Syria. In addition, people such as Rudy Giuliani, Chris Christie, Bob Corker and Newt Gingrich must have no place in the Trump administration.
The system should present its favorable candidates for key jobs in Trump administration. Decisions of Donald Trump and Republicans at this stage, would determine future decisions of the system over the White House and Congress.
This round of the U.S. Presidential election was a great opportunity for the system to detect covered pro-Russians and sleeper agents. Simply, all of them must be removed immediately. The system must implement the order in all informational, political, economic and cultural fields in the United States.
The result of the election was the consequence of testing capability of the system by Washington.
Without a doubt, the Democratic Party could win the recent Presidential election if they did not intrigue against Sanders campaign or if they cooperate with the system over middle class and people. And certainly winning of Trump, the anti-establishment candidate in both primary and general elections indicated interference of the system against Republican since their decisions through the years were unacceptable in the view point of the system. Of course in the recent years, the White House and Congress did not have a proper relationship with the system and they inevitably paid for it.
The positions of the system over Russia and Iran are considered red lines. Therefore, Donald Trump is requested to avoid withdrawing against Moscow, and also, stop animosity to Iran. Donald Trump is asked by the system to put an end to the Washington interference in the domestic affairs of Syria. In addition, people such as Rudy Giuliani, Chris Christie, Bob Corker and Newt Gingrich must have no place in the Trump administration.
The system should present its favorable candidates for key jobs in Trump administration. Decisions of Donald Trump and Republicans at this stage, would determine future decisions of the system over the White House and Congress.
Tuesday, November 8, 2016
...
The system promised to harden presidential contest for Hillary Clinton campaign. Observers can evaluate the performance of the system in this regard and accordingly, adjust their decisions.
In 2014, the system warned those who always have had influential role in engineering of the US elections that it will disrupt 2016 Presidential election against their plans. The mentioned document is accessible. That warning was not propaganda or a political bluff!
Not only the right to democracy but also further, the right to revolution has been recognized through the United Sates Declaration of Independence. Although the system’s interpretation of the Human Rights might be different with that of the UN Human Rights Council; meanwhile governments guide the Council.
People are not musical notes to be played for political ambitious of a group. The mainstream media claim neutral and democratic position over people and events. But none of them allow Gary Johnson and Jill Stein, the US presidential candidates, to present their plans, even for a moment. This Presidential election proved to people in the Unites States and the rest of nations, that the mainstream media and Washington are not ready to accept a democratic transition of power to people.
In 2014, the system warned those who always have had influential role in engineering of the US elections that it will disrupt 2016 Presidential election against their plans. The mentioned document is accessible. That warning was not propaganda or a political bluff!
Not only the right to democracy but also further, the right to revolution has been recognized through the United Sates Declaration of Independence. Although the system’s interpretation of the Human Rights might be different with that of the UN Human Rights Council; meanwhile governments guide the Council.
People are not musical notes to be played for political ambitious of a group. The mainstream media claim neutral and democratic position over people and events. But none of them allow Gary Johnson and Jill Stein, the US presidential candidates, to present their plans, even for a moment. This Presidential election proved to people in the Unites States and the rest of nations, that the mainstream media and Washington are not ready to accept a democratic transition of power to people.
Tuesday, October 18, 2016
The U.S. Presidential Election: Political Adventure
It is time for truth!
For the first time in the history of the United States Presidential elections, both leaders of Republicans and Democrats support a single candidate. It is evident that the decision of Republican leaders and the publication of The Washington Post against Trump was a plot and suicidal attack. Given the fact that Donald Trump has never been a powerful candidate, the coalition of the Democratic Party and Republican Party against him has just proved the upper hand and strength of the system in the political games. And the unstable situation of Clinton campaign in the election could force the White House to burn the Mosul card, which was a victory for the system, Iraq and Iran. Well, it is so good to get a golden point without a deal! Of course, the system will not give up on the election.
A part of truth should be revealed at this point of time since new operations must be carried out in order to insure the security of the world. According to classified information, Clinton’s donors have intended to launch a new war. The potential time is a year after possible presidency of Clinton. Location is Iran and the city of Hamadan is a potential target. The way of implementation of the plan is creating a fake incident, like, September 11 and 2014 Gaza War. In addition, Hillary Clinton almost knows most of this project.
Luckily, the efforts of the system and certainly, the movement of Sanders' campaign could vanish the popularity of Clinton; the heavy gun of "popularity" lets its owner to simply run ambitious plans.
So according to the facts, the system and the agents can take their time and ensure the security through purging the mobs and donors and pressing pressure against their family. But their children and pets would be left alone. It is no matter what would be the result of the US Presidential election; the system wins the time!
For the first time in the history of the United States Presidential elections, both leaders of Republicans and Democrats support a single candidate. It is evident that the decision of Republican leaders and the publication of The Washington Post against Trump was a plot and suicidal attack. Given the fact that Donald Trump has never been a powerful candidate, the coalition of the Democratic Party and Republican Party against him has just proved the upper hand and strength of the system in the political games. And the unstable situation of Clinton campaign in the election could force the White House to burn the Mosul card, which was a victory for the system, Iraq and Iran. Well, it is so good to get a golden point without a deal! Of course, the system will not give up on the election.
A part of truth should be revealed at this point of time since new operations must be carried out in order to insure the security of the world. According to classified information, Clinton’s donors have intended to launch a new war. The potential time is a year after possible presidency of Clinton. Location is Iran and the city of Hamadan is a potential target. The way of implementation of the plan is creating a fake incident, like, September 11 and 2014 Gaza War. In addition, Hillary Clinton almost knows most of this project.
Luckily, the efforts of the system and certainly, the movement of Sanders' campaign could vanish the popularity of Clinton; the heavy gun of "popularity" lets its owner to simply run ambitious plans.
So according to the facts, the system and the agents can take their time and ensure the security through purging the mobs and donors and pressing pressure against their family. But their children and pets would be left alone. It is no matter what would be the result of the US Presidential election; the system wins the time!
Tuesday, October 11, 2016
Sexual Assault: A Case
The second debate of the U.S. presidential election between Hillary Clinton and Donal Trump was wondering since there are many who are really considered a sexual threat to women; it is not about any Presidential candidate but there are some people among audience who sexually assault young women. As everyone has noticed the system never forgives because it can. And if the woman, who are a friend of the system believes that it was just a mistake (without the mens rea), the case can be ignored, otherwise the system is responsible for improving the security of the society. But it seems that the woman could transferred a negative signal to the man through her meaningful move of the elbow. Although it was fast but it was sufficient to find out that the man committed a crime.
In this regard, a review on the movie The Salesman would be relevant. It seems that the script for the end parts of the movie was written before other parts of it, since it is perfect. The latest movie of Asghar Farhadi has different aspects to review. Some may support the viewpoints of Farhadi over the subject of revenge and some may not. However, what makes this movie all comparable with the movie A Separation is that, both of them are an analytical report of society or a scientific article with new information about an altering society.
None of the characters of the movie are modern or liberal people. Although all of them including the man, woman and old man live in a modern society and their legal or even illegal activities flow in a modern community even in details such as the position that the man did not even forget to put on cologne even soon after victimization of his wife. By the way, all of them are doomed to wrong thought of traditionalism.
The movie has no hero; but there are a lot of victims who are themselves guilty. For instance, the woman forgives the old man because as she admitted, she was afraid to declare the situation she has experienced in front of police officers (who are probably men). While a good citizen would stop the criminal, she did not. It indicates that the woman suffers from traditionalism more than the incident. Another example, the man never rose his voice over the old man and he did not disclose his secret to his family. But the man could easily rise his voice over a teenage student and embarrass him in front of all his classmates and friends and more than that, humiliate him by an act like bullying, which was illegal access to private information of his cell phone, which originates from the notion that children rights is less important than adults.
In this regard, a review on the movie The Salesman would be relevant. It seems that the script for the end parts of the movie was written before other parts of it, since it is perfect. The latest movie of Asghar Farhadi has different aspects to review. Some may support the viewpoints of Farhadi over the subject of revenge and some may not. However, what makes this movie all comparable with the movie A Separation is that, both of them are an analytical report of society or a scientific article with new information about an altering society.
None of the characters of the movie are modern or liberal people. Although all of them including the man, woman and old man live in a modern society and their legal or even illegal activities flow in a modern community even in details such as the position that the man did not even forget to put on cologne even soon after victimization of his wife. By the way, all of them are doomed to wrong thought of traditionalism.
The movie has no hero; but there are a lot of victims who are themselves guilty. For instance, the woman forgives the old man because as she admitted, she was afraid to declare the situation she has experienced in front of police officers (who are probably men). While a good citizen would stop the criminal, she did not. It indicates that the woman suffers from traditionalism more than the incident. Another example, the man never rose his voice over the old man and he did not disclose his secret to his family. But the man could easily rise his voice over a teenage student and embarrass him in front of all his classmates and friends and more than that, humiliate him by an act like bullying, which was illegal access to private information of his cell phone, which originates from the notion that children rights is less important than adults.
Tuesday, September 27, 2016
Keep Calm and Debate
The best teacher is experience!
First, the winner of a debate is one who can convince audience and there are many techniques for reaching this goal.
Second, confuse audience by boring and academic lectures when you have no answer or ideal plan. A successful plan is the one that is based on a unique and comprehensive idea. Clinton's economy program has a goal and plan without an ingenious idea and innovative. Franklin Roosevelt and Ronald Reagan both had innovative programs for economy. If Clinton's economy plan was a paper or thesis, no researching and scientific journal and professor would accept it because it had no new and innovative solution for issues.
Third, a wise person refuses to answer to judgment and comments of his rival. New York Times would not be just or neutral judge for Republicans and so Clinton would not be a neutral judge toward Trump. Clinton's trick could entangle Trump and put him in a defensive position while he could easily clarify this fact that she is against him and has no good faith and then undermine validity of her judgments and information without any struggle!
Fourth, do not give the audience tens of facts in a limited time because no one can get them all but give them five facts and repeat them tens of times. Trump's facts on economy was too many!
Fifth, it is more convenient to provide a key sentence for every subject at the beginning of the speech, for instance, "peace is hard but war is easy" would be considered a key sentence for an anti-war lecture. Neither Clinton, nor Trump have used it.
Sixth, shorten your lecture. It is a technique and Clinton finally did it well after many lectures and books that were tiring for Democrats.
First, the winner of a debate is one who can convince audience and there are many techniques for reaching this goal.
Second, confuse audience by boring and academic lectures when you have no answer or ideal plan. A successful plan is the one that is based on a unique and comprehensive idea. Clinton's economy program has a goal and plan without an ingenious idea and innovative. Franklin Roosevelt and Ronald Reagan both had innovative programs for economy. If Clinton's economy plan was a paper or thesis, no researching and scientific journal and professor would accept it because it had no new and innovative solution for issues.
Third, a wise person refuses to answer to judgment and comments of his rival. New York Times would not be just or neutral judge for Republicans and so Clinton would not be a neutral judge toward Trump. Clinton's trick could entangle Trump and put him in a defensive position while he could easily clarify this fact that she is against him and has no good faith and then undermine validity of her judgments and information without any struggle!
Fourth, do not give the audience tens of facts in a limited time because no one can get them all but give them five facts and repeat them tens of times. Trump's facts on economy was too many!
Fifth, it is more convenient to provide a key sentence for every subject at the beginning of the speech, for instance, "peace is hard but war is easy" would be considered a key sentence for an anti-war lecture. Neither Clinton, nor Trump have used it.
Sixth, shorten your lecture. It is a technique and Clinton finally did it well after many lectures and books that were tiring for Democrats.
Monday, September 12, 2016
Teenagers for the System
It is still strange for a story to choose its writer rather than vice versa.
Today teenagers can render great service to people but in their own way, the way that society rejects it. Those who embrace new experiences and more than anything, willing to play the big drum, are confirmed by the system.
No teenager needs alcohol, marijuana and etc. for having fun, but all of them are full of their own energy and an energy must be released because it is natural. If these teenagers want to experience what they see on the movie screen or when playing video games, the system says welcome to them.
Therefore, a specific channel for teenagers between ages 12-17 must be established but its function and characteristic should be similar to an agency in order to separate its goals, projects and activities from other parts of the system. It is evident that for keeping the system safe, it is essential to design this channel in a way to require minimum need for communicating with others.
And from now on, every six months two men and two women will be rewarded for "best use of gun" and "best submission of intelligence".
Today teenagers can render great service to people but in their own way, the way that society rejects it. Those who embrace new experiences and more than anything, willing to play the big drum, are confirmed by the system.
No teenager needs alcohol, marijuana and etc. for having fun, but all of them are full of their own energy and an energy must be released because it is natural. If these teenagers want to experience what they see on the movie screen or when playing video games, the system says welcome to them.
Therefore, a specific channel for teenagers between ages 12-17 must be established but its function and characteristic should be similar to an agency in order to separate its goals, projects and activities from other parts of the system. It is evident that for keeping the system safe, it is essential to design this channel in a way to require minimum need for communicating with others.
And from now on, every six months two men and two women will be rewarded for "best use of gun" and "best submission of intelligence".
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)