Russia: An Unfinished War

Iran is one of the key issues in the Middle East. However, even dealing with Iran's threats alone can create opportunities, but the Russian issue is quite different. 
Bush's miscalculation and neglect of Moscow's threats should not be repeated. Nevertheless, the focus of the international community is on the Middle East. While neither Russia is weak enough nor even predictable. 
Russia's all-out the intelligence war in 2014 revealed a reality: Russian silence is just a disguise for their threatening projects. Currently, both Russian intelligence and survivors of removed Moscow-linked mobs are calling for a new war. They are looking for some sort of revenge. Needless to say, their ability has declined sharply since 2014. However, the system's members must be secured even in hell as a top priority. Therefore, a new war must be declared against all remnants of the removed mobs and all the groups in which they operate directly or indirectly. It can be considered a test for Moscow; if they do not want war, then they will not interfere in this fight, otherwise, and if the war is inevitable, the system itself will set the zero hour.

Tehran: A Piece of Silence

Many of the violent crimes are motivated by irrational causes. This is the reality of the world; a fact that reminds one that the 'life mechanism' is not everything for everyone, or at least always. 
The US maximum pressure policy on the Islamic Republic has worked is spite of the expectation of some politicians. But the one thing that has been overlooked about Iran for some time and will probably be fixed in the future is the psychological and cultural status of Tehran. The policy of maximum pressure against the Islamic Republic must continue in silence. In such a case, the Iranian government can respond fully to the pressures. Psychological warfare against Tehran only provokes them to show an immediate and emotional reaction. One cannot get on someone's bad side and then expect a rational response. 
Leaders of the Iranian government are mentally unprepared to play a political role; they are attached to a variety of non-political parameters in a political arena, like an actor who is dependent on the psychosocial deterrent elements of his real-life role. Such an actor resists not only nudity but also any role or act that is far from his true character. The director must play the role of a psychologist as well.

Yellow Fans: The People

There are always some fans of a celebrity, sports team, or even a political candidate, who are considered ‘yellow fans’, i.e. those who cannot be identified as true believers but are actually ‘users'. So influencing them does not follow the orthodox methods. Perhaps like a short-term and occasional relationship that only limited to sexual intercourse, and the character and personality of the parties are not into question at all, while, and both are aware users. Of course, no mind is invulnerable and one's mental aperture (if discovered) is needed plus a few seconds to plant a seed. But all the techniques in this regard apply when one only wants to shoot at a mind or crack into it, not blowing up an intellectual bomb. 
One of the traditional ways of promoting an idea or a new cultural thought is to present it, for instance, through celebrities. The rise of Facebook, Twitter and Instagram raised the hope for many that cultural and social leadership would move forward with greater speed and power. But the results of projects have been far from the hopes and expectations and have shown another face of reality. Although the long-term results may be more promising, but even the analysis of British programs has not shown different outcomes.
Anyway, changing people's minds doesn't necessarily change their lives. Even if people experience or enjoy some changes in their lives, they try to classify them among their own secrets. These secrets are their truth, but the reality of their lives is something else. And that's another problem that has been overlooked. Therefore, sometimes the success of a project in changing people's minds is not translated into the emergence of these changes publicly and openly. While what changes the world is not faith but action; what makes a society religious is merely the action of the people, even if most of it is pretension. 
And what changes the culture throughout the ages is the change of order. As the political order in Afghanistan altered, the cultural order began to change: a period towards liberalism and then towards fundamentalism. Technology can change the order too. For example, Instagram alone has had a role in changing many people's lifestyles or habits, isn't it?! 
So the question is, what technology or even innovations can govern the desired social order of the system?

Latin American: The People

The globalization of human rights, which has entered a new phase through the emergence of the doctrine of responsibility to protect, reinforces the notion that political and cultural borders cannot exempt states from fulfilling the human rights obligations. However, the idea of good global governance should not be limited to human rights. Some strategic and geopolitical resources have trans-regional and global value. Frontiers should not play the role of a fortress for failed states, especially if they are unable to properly manage these assets. 
Latin America is one of those areas where much of its geopolitical capacity remains untouched. Nowadays, Latin America has no ideal among leftists and no hope through right-wing path. In such circumstances, the primary function of the economic problems is displayed: The people become masses and that includes the educated population. Everything is ready for the masses engineering. 
Communists and Socialists have long fascinated Latin American cultural and social atmosphere, but today, after decades, an opportunity to re-engineer the masses in Latin America is just found. This opportunity can be used to run trial versions of the project that can be known as 'the system people' – the project that connects the system directly and indirectly to the people. And it is worth mentioning, the internationalist essence of the system and its unique approach upon human rights and security are all in line with the needs of Latin America. 
Everything must be clear over modeling process of masses engineering and therefore, there is no need to say that for instance, a "Noam Chomsky" is enough to find out how many people in society are interested in a certain lifestyle, idea, and style of civil struggle. It is not required to focus on one model. The main investment should be concentrate on ideas. Various social and cultural models can be presented through individuals, groups and other ways to discover the most applicable ones. Eventually, based on the data, one can combine the best variables and present the final version that should act as the Trojan horse of the system.

The People

People believe that the god is merciful but they have mostly disregard the fact that there is a difference between god, human and even a dog (!) over this very characteristic. People need sinners to remove some other sinners they dislike to keep their own hands away from anything filthy and bloody. 
However, the system can provide anything they need to believe all they are pretending; to find themselves as liberal or even as someone religious without even challenging their faith in confronting with the real world. The system is everything that people want. Still they cannot believe that it is the reflection of their true will. 
 If people are to actually become partakers of power someday, they must be able to accept their responsibilities mentally and practically. Fortunately, people today are more aware than ever. Many taboos and stereotypes have been broken and technology has accelerated the intellectual and cultural evolution of society. Therefore, it is possible to gradually make people familiar and ready over realistic and pragmatic ways of dealing with current and upcoming threats. As a result, the system would be able to openly take the greatest steps toward its objectives.

Iran: Economic War

The Islamic Republic of Iran has formed its policies based on a warfare strategy so that every single issue could be addressed in this way including disputes with the Washington, Tel Aviv or even domestic concerns over human rights, environment, and educational system. This toxic perspective toward everything may endanger everyone in and out of this regime. The world community is seeking the removal of this strategy from the decision-making table of Tehran. 
In this regard, the nuclear deal was going to be an introduction and not even a chapter for the new story of the Middle East. But the Islamic Republic has demonstrated that it is not ready for playing its part in the new game of the region. 
Anyway, all roads lead to Rome but the Iranian government is just as unaware of the big picture as Iraq's Saddam was. However, what ruined Iraqi dictatorship was more than a decade of harsh sanctions and economic war against Baghdad. And it is exactly what should be launched and its continuity is ensured against Tehran. And there is no need to add that sanctions are only an old and sometimes even symbolic means of economic war; an all-out economic war is needed.

Israel-Palestine: Possible Peace

After decades, Israel and Saudi Arabia as the leading actors of the Middle East, both have indicated true will for governing peace over Israeli-Arab relations in the region. Still, reaching a steady peace between Israel and Palestine definitely requires semi-withdrawal by both parties from their unrealistic positions. However, the lack of common understanding among the involved parties could waste hours of dialogues and frustrate any plans. 
Above all plans and dealings, it must be considered that conservatism is not only the spirit of cultural and political structures of Arab nations but a symbolic criterion of power. Therefore, it is no surprise to find out that changes can only slowly take place in such societies. In sum, Arab states are not ready for great and rapid changes. So it must be figured out that the mere common interests would not lead to a dialogue with common understanding in respect to the mentioned issue. Keep this logic in mind, for making any progress in a traditional society, one should always have an "undo" option, otherwise, the fear of transition from the status quo would hold the society from moving forward.
Therefore, no new element is entered unless by taking the appearance of old and known ones; the change would not be made unless it is infiltrated. For instance, temporary dealings like de facto recognition of Israeli and Palestinian states by both sides can give the confidence to Arabs that changes will not necessarily steady or irreversible.