Although the Middle East has opened a widespread opportunities for the U.S. but the recent rapid developments in the arena of international relations and technology have raised the necessity for the Washington D.C. to gradually decrease its focus on the region and instead, strongly address the growing issues of Russia, China and new order in the east Asia. Therefore, the Palestine issue as the first and the most significant problem of the Middle East must be resolved.
Definitely, settlement of the issue would be in favor of all sides including Israel and the major Arab states. Without a doubt, a permanent peace agreement between Tel Aviv and Ramallah could be also considered a geostrategic attack on Tehran. The predictable results of such a deal can put an end to the diplomatic isolation of Israel in the region and change the current balance of power against the Islamic Republic.
According to historical experience, economic sanctions cannot singly realize a specific objective but also might provoke the rogue state to aggressive reactions. Thus, the Washington D.C. should target geostrategic interests of Tehran in order to strengthen the functions of the recent sanctions.
Showing posts with label China. Show all posts
Showing posts with label China. Show all posts
Wednesday, May 30, 2018
Wednesday, April 18, 2018
North Korea and Chinese Hegemony
There is no doubt that Pyongyang is dancing for Beijing; moreover, there is a significant difference between Moscow's perspective toward hegemony and the ones of Chinese government.
Since there is conflict of interest between the Washington DC and Beijing in the Asia and Southeast Asia, finding the covert purpose of China in seeking peace over North Korean issue is in question.
The main question that should be answered is: What will be the desired plan or order of China after the possible settlement of North Korean case?
It seems that the new story or second phase will begin by economy. "Fear" or maybe "threat", are the key elements that keep the current order in the region. But after disappearing of the threat and lifting of sanctions on North Korea, the economic ties among states are the sole permanent parameter that will shape the new balance of power in the Asia.
Penetrating the economic and cultural structures of North Korea would be more important than deactivation of its nuclear and military programs. Western corporations and South Korean entertainment market can play their parts in this regard.
The main question that should be answered is: What will be the desired plan or order of China after the possible settlement of North Korean case?
It seems that the new story or second phase will begin by economy. "Fear" or maybe "threat", are the key elements that keep the current order in the region. But after disappearing of the threat and lifting of sanctions on North Korea, the economic ties among states are the sole permanent parameter that will shape the new balance of power in the Asia.
Penetrating the economic and cultural structures of North Korea would be more important than deactivation of its nuclear and military programs. Western corporations and South Korean entertainment market can play their parts in this regard.
Wednesday, March 7, 2018
Post-Globalization Economies
Dependency is a known weakness.
Economic globalization is as harmful as addiction to oil, in particular for major powers.
The global economic ties can vanish the leading position of the sates due to deep dependency on their economic and commercial relations with rivals. Keep in mind, the basic leverage of the U.S. in the Cold War era against the Soviet, which gave the upper hand to the Washington in this regard, was not the NATO, but absence of effective economic ties with Eastern Bloc.
Both the U.S. and Europe need to establish an alternative to the current economic world order, in order to reduce their economic dependency on China, Russia and emerging powers including India and Brazil, to make them immune against these world political players.
At the end, the political and economic position of the West is good enough to lead the world, but it cannot be fully achieved until they do not release themselves from economic bonds of globalization.
Economic globalization is as harmful as addiction to oil, in particular for major powers.
The global economic ties can vanish the leading position of the sates due to deep dependency on their economic and commercial relations with rivals. Keep in mind, the basic leverage of the U.S. in the Cold War era against the Soviet, which gave the upper hand to the Washington in this regard, was not the NATO, but absence of effective economic ties with Eastern Bloc.
Both the U.S. and Europe need to establish an alternative to the current economic world order, in order to reduce their economic dependency on China, Russia and emerging powers including India and Brazil, to make them immune against these world political players.
At the end, the political and economic position of the West is good enough to lead the world, but it cannot be fully achieved until they do not release themselves from economic bonds of globalization.
Wednesday, February 21, 2018
North Korea: A Different Threat
It is not hard to know yourself; staying at your own position is matter.
China and Russia are two main actors of the world and whereas the term "new world order" was initiated by the U.S. but Washington DC is not the player that is going to take over the globalization. War on Afghanistan and Iraq were the best post-Cold War gift to Moscow in order to get a recovery. And now, the White House is surrounded by small and unnecessary issues including North Korea.
Although paranoid politics is not a wise approach but finding the climate change and subsequently, the Paris Agreement as Chinese hoax and dismissing the very Pyongyang play, is not politics anymore. As the North Korea case is in the question, China is enabled to benefits from the Korean conflict.
Neutralizing the North Korean card is the best move in favor of constant security and against Beijing. At this point of time, the White House should concentrate on the world order, globalization, the current major and emerging actors such as India and Brazil.
China and Russia are two main actors of the world and whereas the term "new world order" was initiated by the U.S. but Washington DC is not the player that is going to take over the globalization. War on Afghanistan and Iraq were the best post-Cold War gift to Moscow in order to get a recovery. And now, the White House is surrounded by small and unnecessary issues including North Korea.
Although paranoid politics is not a wise approach but finding the climate change and subsequently, the Paris Agreement as Chinese hoax and dismissing the very Pyongyang play, is not politics anymore. As the North Korea case is in the question, China is enabled to benefits from the Korean conflict.
Neutralizing the North Korean card is the best move in favor of constant security and against Beijing. At this point of time, the White House should concentrate on the world order, globalization, the current major and emerging actors such as India and Brazil.
Wednesday, February 7, 2018
Climate Guideline
Searching for covert functions of things is an art of politics. Climate change is an "urgent threat" to humanity. And of course it has been considered a concern for all. So first of all, one should address the political and legal issues in respect with the Paris Agreement.
Given the fact, that the most greenhouse gases are emitted by the United States and China, it can be claimed, the idea that promoted a global agreement such as Kyoto Protocol and Paris Agreement as a solution has been incompatible. Although, the climate change is a hazard for all around the world, but just like a possible nuclear war in the Cold War era, the problem can only be settled by the states that are roughly responsible in this regard. Apart from a possible mutual agreements between U.S. and China, the EU as an active player can close separate financial and commercial contracts with Washington DC and Beijing, which include some climate conditions and obligations.
Moreover, confronting the climate change can produce its own life style for the youth who want to be activist, intellectual and different at the same time. Without a doubt, it contains anti-consumerism thought but reversely, it itself, strengthen the green tech markets and stuff like that. It might be useful later. Therefore, the system must make it into a brand.
Given the fact, that the most greenhouse gases are emitted by the United States and China, it can be claimed, the idea that promoted a global agreement such as Kyoto Protocol and Paris Agreement as a solution has been incompatible. Although, the climate change is a hazard for all around the world, but just like a possible nuclear war in the Cold War era, the problem can only be settled by the states that are roughly responsible in this regard. Apart from a possible mutual agreements between U.S. and China, the EU as an active player can close separate financial and commercial contracts with Washington DC and Beijing, which include some climate conditions and obligations.
Moreover, confronting the climate change can produce its own life style for the youth who want to be activist, intellectual and different at the same time. Without a doubt, it contains anti-consumerism thought but reversely, it itself, strengthen the green tech markets and stuff like that. It might be useful later. Therefore, the system must make it into a brand.
Tuesday, August 1, 2017
North Korea: Sleeping Samurai
Maintaining the balance of power requires active cooperation of global powers over the containing or distributing power.
Japan is one of few world powers that lost the ability for active cooperation in forming global balance of power because of facing China and especially North Korea challenges. Keep this logic in mind, the winner cart of the U.S. in the World War II and the Cold War, was the distance from the scene, which was Europe. It is evident that as long as Japanese are concerned about the regional threat of North Korea, they have to impose some considerations to their international relations in favor of China, Russia and the US, which leads to a semi-passive foreign policy from Tokyo. In spite of that, the position of Japan toward Ukraine Crisis in 2014 was decisive.
The winner of managing the North Korean crisis have been Russia and China since it made them able to use North Korea as a leverage for restraining Japan. So the crisis must be settled.
In this respect, as the first step the system must initiate two tripartite and quartet talks: 3-party talks between Tokyo, Seoul and the System and 4-party talks including Pyongyang.
Japan is one of few world powers that lost the ability for active cooperation in forming global balance of power because of facing China and especially North Korea challenges. Keep this logic in mind, the winner cart of the U.S. in the World War II and the Cold War, was the distance from the scene, which was Europe. It is evident that as long as Japanese are concerned about the regional threat of North Korea, they have to impose some considerations to their international relations in favor of China, Russia and the US, which leads to a semi-passive foreign policy from Tokyo. In spite of that, the position of Japan toward Ukraine Crisis in 2014 was decisive.
The winner of managing the North Korean crisis have been Russia and China since it made them able to use North Korea as a leverage for restraining Japan. So the crisis must be settled.
In this respect, as the first step the system must initiate two tripartite and quartet talks: 3-party talks between Tokyo, Seoul and the System and 4-party talks including Pyongyang.
Saturday, February 7, 2015
Secrecy of Secret Israelis
An old Israeli secret society is still active within the system while all of the System-Israel relationships have been cut and Israel continues to feed the terrorist group ISIS. Ten people of the system are members of the society and Steven Cohen as the first member is the chair.
Cohen, the 58-year-old man should be asked: Why the existence of the society has yet been hidden for the system?
Why he did not announce even the name of one the group members who worked for him?
With this incentive in mind, all of the 9 members are of plain-clothes and non-celebrity agents.
No one hides a legal action for 15 years! Then why Cohen did so?!
If his action did not treated a crime, then why did not unveil it?!
Also, who commission the Syria mission to these agents?
The system or Israel?!
Of course, his secret cooperation with Russia and China must also be added to these items. And certainly, there are significant questions in this regard to be should asked of him.
Complete information about the society's activities, missions and members must be obtained.
From now on, none of the ten Israeli double agents are considered the system's members.
Any attempt by Cohen to get close to Israel, Russia, China or any intelligence agency and mafia is prohibited.
Effective monitoring should be applied to prevent any suspicious action or omission.
The removal of the "security" label of all of the ten society’s people is the penalty for breach of this award.
Cohen, the 58-year-old man should be asked: Why the existence of the society has yet been hidden for the system?
Why he did not announce even the name of one the group members who worked for him?
With this incentive in mind, all of the 9 members are of plain-clothes and non-celebrity agents.
No one hides a legal action for 15 years! Then why Cohen did so?!
If his action did not treated a crime, then why did not unveil it?!
Also, who commission the Syria mission to these agents?
The system or Israel?!
Of course, his secret cooperation with Russia and China must also be added to these items. And certainly, there are significant questions in this regard to be should asked of him.
Complete information about the society's activities, missions and members must be obtained.
From now on, none of the ten Israeli double agents are considered the system's members.
Any attempt by Cohen to get close to Israel, Russia, China or any intelligence agency and mafia is prohibited.
Effective monitoring should be applied to prevent any suspicious action or omission.
The removal of the "security" label of all of the ten society’s people is the penalty for breach of this award.
Sunday, November 16, 2014
US-China: Distribution of Power
The proper distribution of power is the supreme goal that the balance of power seeks. This means that the power is distributed so that there is no country or groups of superpower. Sometimes groups or nations are united with each other and form a coalition against the group or the country that has lots of power in order to accomplish the goal.
Why World War II was happened?
Because the Germans have broken the Europe balance of power while other European countries have not been united with each other before the war began. In other words, they didn't fix the distribution of power by a balance of power before the war.
Why World War III did not happen?
Because many western countries of the world have formed a military alliance against Soviet, called NATO; NATO which is consists of Western powers, could establish the balance of power. This promoted a group has the same power of Soviet, and the chance of Soviet has sharply and greatly reduced if the World War III possibly happens. Naturally, the Soviet had no tendency and willing to start World War III in such a circumstance.
Now it should be asked, what had happened to the political points that were given by Nixon to China?
Is the United States known as the winner of the Vietnam War or China become a superpower in Asia?!
Uncontrollable political and economic powers are free from the balance of power circle only if they are reliable (like United States). This is a principle of security.
How much can be trusted on Beijing?
Why World War II was happened?
Because the Germans have broken the Europe balance of power while other European countries have not been united with each other before the war began. In other words, they didn't fix the distribution of power by a balance of power before the war.
Why World War III did not happen?
Because many western countries of the world have formed a military alliance against Soviet, called NATO; NATO which is consists of Western powers, could establish the balance of power. This promoted a group has the same power of Soviet, and the chance of Soviet has sharply and greatly reduced if the World War III possibly happens. Naturally, the Soviet had no tendency and willing to start World War III in such a circumstance.
Now it should be asked, what had happened to the political points that were given by Nixon to China?
Is the United States known as the winner of the Vietnam War or China become a superpower in Asia?!
Uncontrollable political and economic powers are free from the balance of power circle only if they are reliable (like United States). This is a principle of security.
How much can be trusted on Beijing?
Monday, July 7, 2014
Asia as the Opportunity for Delhi and India as the Opportunity for Washington
Political and strategic behaviors of the new leadership of India in the political arena, represents the high political expectations of Delhi. There is no doubt that India is facing two options. The first option which is in favor of the political nature and status of India, is raising the level of competition with China and implementing a new competitive dialogue to explore and achieve new goals and opportunities in Asia and the world. The second option is to break the political taboos in India and starting a new season with removing tensions in its relations with China and Pakistan.
Moscow soon noticed the changes in New Delhi and therefore tries to play with the Pakistan's card including signing a recent contract with this country on the energy and omitting the sanction on military sales to Islamabad tries to prevent the changes in Delhi's policies.
An important point is that Delhi would not be able to select the mentioned first option without the support of Washington.
India will definitely have enough potential to be able to replace China in the Asia and maybe the global arena in the future. But what is possible to make the Hindi potential attractive, is the relatively hostile competition between India and China. So the increase of this competition in Asia will lead Delhi to change as the balance wheel of Asia. Undoubtedly, the balance wheel theory, the aim of which is to distribute of power in a way that prevents a country from being a superpower and can be found as a means to curb the growing power of Beijing in Asia.
But what should be noted is that the relationship between Pakistan and India should not be worse than what it is, because the increased competition between Pakistan and India will increase the costs in Delhi and this reduces their ability to compete with China, therefore there is no doubt that the winner of a hostile rivalry between India and Pakistan would definitely be Beijing.
Moscow soon noticed the changes in New Delhi and therefore tries to play with the Pakistan's card including signing a recent contract with this country on the energy and omitting the sanction on military sales to Islamabad tries to prevent the changes in Delhi's policies.
An important point is that Delhi would not be able to select the mentioned first option without the support of Washington.
India will definitely have enough potential to be able to replace China in the Asia and maybe the global arena in the future. But what is possible to make the Hindi potential attractive, is the relatively hostile competition between India and China. So the increase of this competition in Asia will lead Delhi to change as the balance wheel of Asia. Undoubtedly, the balance wheel theory, the aim of which is to distribute of power in a way that prevents a country from being a superpower and can be found as a means to curb the growing power of Beijing in Asia.
But what should be noted is that the relationship between Pakistan and India should not be worse than what it is, because the increased competition between Pakistan and India will increase the costs in Delhi and this reduces their ability to compete with China, therefore there is no doubt that the winner of a hostile rivalry between India and Pakistan would definitely be Beijing.
Friday, June 6, 2014
Smaller Russia and Bigger China
Political events caused by the Ukraine crisis clearly indicated that not only the West but also China has taken the label of victory through acquiring new opportunities in Russia.
Sudden economic sanctions against Russia, has forced Moscow to take emergency measures in various fields such as banking, the Caspian Sea and transactions (Gazprom).
It is obvious that the thirty-year Gazprom contract with China which exchanged cheap gas for preventing the collapse of the Russian economy was mostly in favor of Beijing. Beijing's tactic was evident in the case of Ukraine."Just watch the game and wait, then buy the loser card for a cheap price", actually as Russia gets weaker, it would need to attract China's support, and Beijing, as well gets a higher chance to acquire more political and economic gains in Moscow. But we should not forget that Washington has two rivals, the first one to be Moscow and the other is Beijing. So, although the White House is able to defeat Moscow in a costly competition with Kremlin, but China will achieve economic and political advantages from Russia to the amount of the costs that America pays in this game, therefore, China would be able to confiscate the game.
The position that China would have in a Cold War between Moscow and Washington is similar to the state of West during the Iran-Iraq war. Thus, selling arms to both hostile parties, the West and even Israel (referred to Iran-gate) were weakening Tehran and Baghdad as the threatening elements in the Middle east as a result of the continuing the war.There is no doubt that White House should not ignore the policy of containment on Russia, but it is necessary to verify the tactic of the policy of containment by considering the fact of China. What is needed is that a power struggle should develop within Russia. As at the time of Boris Yeltsin there was such a quarrel in Russia and caused the Russian government's inefficiency in the arena of international politics. The formation of such a quarrel is provided with regard to the failure of Moscow and the damages to Russia as a result of the adventures of the Kremlin leadership. So by putting the burden of liability for failures on Vladimir Putin, it would be like a spark in a place full of carbon dioxide. On the other hand, when the West differentiates the fight against Putin's politics from the issue of competing with Moscow, has shown its good faith. Thus, without having to pay a competitive price against Moscow, the West can eliminate its rival.
Sudden economic sanctions against Russia, has forced Moscow to take emergency measures in various fields such as banking, the Caspian Sea and transactions (Gazprom).
It is obvious that the thirty-year Gazprom contract with China which exchanged cheap gas for preventing the collapse of the Russian economy was mostly in favor of Beijing. Beijing's tactic was evident in the case of Ukraine."Just watch the game and wait, then buy the loser card for a cheap price", actually as Russia gets weaker, it would need to attract China's support, and Beijing, as well gets a higher chance to acquire more political and economic gains in Moscow. But we should not forget that Washington has two rivals, the first one to be Moscow and the other is Beijing. So, although the White House is able to defeat Moscow in a costly competition with Kremlin, but China will achieve economic and political advantages from Russia to the amount of the costs that America pays in this game, therefore, China would be able to confiscate the game.
The position that China would have in a Cold War between Moscow and Washington is similar to the state of West during the Iran-Iraq war. Thus, selling arms to both hostile parties, the West and even Israel (referred to Iran-gate) were weakening Tehran and Baghdad as the threatening elements in the Middle east as a result of the continuing the war.There is no doubt that White House should not ignore the policy of containment on Russia, but it is necessary to verify the tactic of the policy of containment by considering the fact of China. What is needed is that a power struggle should develop within Russia. As at the time of Boris Yeltsin there was such a quarrel in Russia and caused the Russian government's inefficiency in the arena of international politics. The formation of such a quarrel is provided with regard to the failure of Moscow and the damages to Russia as a result of the adventures of the Kremlin leadership. So by putting the burden of liability for failures on Vladimir Putin, it would be like a spark in a place full of carbon dioxide. On the other hand, when the West differentiates the fight against Putin's politics from the issue of competing with Moscow, has shown its good faith. Thus, without having to pay a competitive price against Moscow, the West can eliminate its rival.
Friday, April 11, 2014
Who's Afraid of the Joker Card – Ukraine?!
The release of dissatisfaction potentials after the aftershocks of the Crimean crisis is the cause of the East Ukraine 's rebellion, it means that the crisis in East Ukraine like the Arab Spring and movements of the 50s and 60s in Latin America follow a domino theory or model and aren't considered as a dependent crisis. Success and failure of such crises strongly depend on the spatial and temporal proximity to the area of a political quake. The area of the political quake in Ukraine is Crimea. Thus, the longer the time span between the Crimea crisis and the crisis in East Ukraine, the less possible is the victory of the East Ukraine rebellions. (Of course, if the rebellion does not enter an armed phase.)
The rebellions of East Ukraine need to achieve early and rapid success, because if their rebellion becomes prolonged, their rebellion will have the same fate that the revolution in Bahrain had experienced.
Bahrain's Revolution has lost most of the chance to win because of getting away from the Arab Spring. Prolongation of the objections period for any movement or any revolution which hasn't been independent but has been related to another political or social quake and is a killing factor.
Therefore, 'killing time' is a policy that can bring peace and stability back to Ukraine.
Also, as long as Crimea is living in our mind, its motivating effect will also be living for the East Ukraine and Russia. Therefore,'silence' on the experience of Crimea is a policy that can perform as a catalyzer. Let's forget Crimea's experience before it becomes a model and a symbol for the Pro-Russian, through a psychological warfare!
However, Moscow doesn't like the experience of the Crimea to be repeated about the East of Ukraine, but rather prefers to create a psychological warfare because otherwise the game will end.
It's about same the Nazi government of Germany which has won the most points through the creation of psychological warfare.
Unfortunately this isn't the whole story. If Kremlin feels to lose the game, it may choose any irrational choice like: Hitler, Muammar Gaddafi and ….
In other words, Moscow is trying to create a psychological warfare using the crisis in East Ukraine and gain points through this psychological warfare but if it feels to lose in this psychological war, it may use any unreasonable options such as military options.
Therefore the responsibility of the West is that,firstly the crisis in East Ukraine ends, and secondly, the psychological warfare does not end to an armed conflict.
About solving the crisis in East Ukraine some explanations were given, but about with standing against changing the psychological war to an armed conflict, it should be said:
Creating an active and temporary diplomacy channel with Russia about Ukraine's crisis create the illusion for Moscow that Western governments have entered the field of Russian game or that they have taken Kremlin's joker card in Ukraine; the card that should never be taken!
On the other hand, China must know that supporting Moscow would not be unanswered. The issue of Taiwan, the Chinese market in America, the Senkaku Islands dispute are issues through addressing which Peking can be easily dissuaded from the idea of supporting Moscow in the crisis of East Ukraine.
For example: only promoting the slogan "Buying Chinese goods is supporting the Chinese government" can be minatory for the Chinese market in America, but this slogan shouldn't be addressed by the government and members of the political class, because the aim is not to create tension in United States - China relationship.
The rebellions of East Ukraine need to achieve early and rapid success, because if their rebellion becomes prolonged, their rebellion will have the same fate that the revolution in Bahrain had experienced.
Bahrain's Revolution has lost most of the chance to win because of getting away from the Arab Spring. Prolongation of the objections period for any movement or any revolution which hasn't been independent but has been related to another political or social quake and is a killing factor.
Therefore, 'killing time' is a policy that can bring peace and stability back to Ukraine.
Also, as long as Crimea is living in our mind, its motivating effect will also be living for the East Ukraine and Russia. Therefore,'silence' on the experience of Crimea is a policy that can perform as a catalyzer. Let's forget Crimea's experience before it becomes a model and a symbol for the Pro-Russian, through a psychological warfare!
However, Moscow doesn't like the experience of the Crimea to be repeated about the East of Ukraine, but rather prefers to create a psychological warfare because otherwise the game will end.
It's about same the Nazi government of Germany which has won the most points through the creation of psychological warfare.
Unfortunately this isn't the whole story. If Kremlin feels to lose the game, it may choose any irrational choice like: Hitler, Muammar Gaddafi and ….
In other words, Moscow is trying to create a psychological warfare using the crisis in East Ukraine and gain points through this psychological warfare but if it feels to lose in this psychological war, it may use any unreasonable options such as military options.
Therefore the responsibility of the West is that,firstly the crisis in East Ukraine ends, and secondly, the psychological warfare does not end to an armed conflict.
About solving the crisis in East Ukraine some explanations were given, but about with standing against changing the psychological war to an armed conflict, it should be said:
Creating an active and temporary diplomacy channel with Russia about Ukraine's crisis create the illusion for Moscow that Western governments have entered the field of Russian game or that they have taken Kremlin's joker card in Ukraine; the card that should never be taken!
On the other hand, China must know that supporting Moscow would not be unanswered. The issue of Taiwan, the Chinese market in America, the Senkaku Islands dispute are issues through addressing which Peking can be easily dissuaded from the idea of supporting Moscow in the crisis of East Ukraine.
For example: only promoting the slogan "Buying Chinese goods is supporting the Chinese government" can be minatory for the Chinese market in America, but this slogan shouldn't be addressed by the government and members of the political class, because the aim is not to create tension in United States - China relationship.
Sunday, February 9, 2014
Cuba isn't the Second China
Maybe if the People's Republic of China wasn't accepted as a member of the United Nations it wouldn't be as powerful, as it today is.
The approval rating for UN and also the Security Council were given to People's Republic of China, during the presidency of Nixon.
This approval rating was given to China in exchange for leaving alone North Vietnam or in other word, the Viet Cong.
The Vietnamese war ended with the fall of Saigon, but China gained such an approval, by which it interrupts the globalization order and directs it against democracy, human rights, and environmental law.
Of course Cuba doesn't have the capability to become a second China but it's a potential Russian base in the American Continent. The isolation that U.S compelled to Cubans made Russia the mere survival Guarantee of Cuba. All governments are definitely struggling to survive. Russia sold the privilege of survival guarantee to Cuba and North Korea, when every other countries in the world, isolated the two aforementioned countries. How much does it costs?
-A share of the Capital!
Anyways, considering the return of Kremlin's attention to Havana, the only approach that can be adopted is resumption of imposition of political and economic isolation against Cuba. But this isn't solely enough; rather, Latin America requires independent political powers in order to create an alliance in Latin America and Caribbean. Doubtlessly, guaranteed such an alliance is organized adequately, it will eliminate the Russian political influence zone in Latin America and Caribbean.
The Ancient Roman Empire's tactic is a proper model for controlling Latin America and Caribbean. Roman Empire appointed local governors for its occupied lands which where inhabited by foreign citizens, and avoided direct governance over those lands.
Controlling Latin America and Caribbean is possible through the Latin American powers which are allies with Washington. Otherwise, we should only hope that the reformations in Cuba won't lead to the power development of this Russian island. We shouldn't forget that the number of Latin American Caribbean citizens residing in the U.S is more than the number of U.S citizens residing in the Latin American countries. An allied Latin America and Caribbean can makes use of its abroad-residing-citizens as a tool for expanding its influence zone, just as the U.S federal government did to Texas back in 1848, when it was part of Mexico.
Of course Cuba doesn't have the capability to become a second China but it's a potential Russian base in the American Continent. The isolation that U.S compelled to Cubans made Russia the mere survival Guarantee of Cuba. All governments are definitely struggling to survive. Russia sold the privilege of survival guarantee to Cuba and North Korea, when every other countries in the world, isolated the two aforementioned countries. How much does it costs?
-A share of the Capital!
Anyways, considering the return of Kremlin's attention to Havana, the only approach that can be adopted is resumption of imposition of political and economic isolation against Cuba. But this isn't solely enough; rather, Latin America requires independent political powers in order to create an alliance in Latin America and Caribbean. Doubtlessly, guaranteed such an alliance is organized adequately, it will eliminate the Russian political influence zone in Latin America and Caribbean.
The Ancient Roman Empire's tactic is a proper model for controlling Latin America and Caribbean. Roman Empire appointed local governors for its occupied lands which where inhabited by foreign citizens, and avoided direct governance over those lands.
Controlling Latin America and Caribbean is possible through the Latin American powers which are allies with Washington. Otherwise, we should only hope that the reformations in Cuba won't lead to the power development of this Russian island. We shouldn't forget that the number of Latin American Caribbean citizens residing in the U.S is more than the number of U.S citizens residing in the Latin American countries. An allied Latin America and Caribbean can makes use of its abroad-residing-citizens as a tool for expanding its influence zone, just as the U.S federal government did to Texas back in 1848, when it was part of Mexico.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)