My recent discussion with a Thai student tend me find some information about the movement of Thai people. According to the student's idea, for the Thai people economy has priority over political ethics and this is the reason of political corruption in Thailand. But they don't have the power and can't change anything.
His reasons couldn't convince me to not express my uncertainty about results.
If they can't change anything so why they chose the option of revolution?
If the economy takes precedence over political morality, then why didn't benefit from election option?
But one can't ignore the fact that there isn't always a reason to create a social movement.
No comments:
Post a Comment