Monday, January 19, 2015

About the Criticism

Freedom of speech and security are complementary. The system is ought to defend both, because it is believed that all of the system’s measures are tenable even for public opinion. It is accepted that the system is not obligated to explain about every award, however this does not mean that the decisions are indefensible or unexplainable.
Launching the establishment of the Internal Security of the System project known as "Secure Order" caused to retirement or extensive cleanup of the system members. As expected, these decisions resulted in relative criticisms of the (former) members of the system. 
In response to their criticisms, it must be said that appropriate chance was given to the majority of the system members (in particular the experienced agents) in order to modifying their behavior. And warnings were given as well (certainly before filtering). Those who have been coordinated their behaviors with "Secure Order" are now considered of the system members and their faults are forgiven. 
At the end, what may bring these discontents to a disturbing phase has been that some of them wanted to conduct vindictive acts by joining a mafia or an abroad intelligence agency. In spite of this, since all of their activities, relationships and connections are encoded and is monitored (often supervising by those who are in good relationship with them), it can be concluded that the possibility of any vengeful act is blocked.

No comments:

Post a Comment