Brexit: Consequences of Denying Discontent

"Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for righteousness, for they will be filled." (Matthew 5:6) 
The silence of people does not translate into indifference or believing organized lies. 
According to classified information, most of young and educated people in Britain voted in favored of Brexit. Moreover, it would be shocking if old people of a society vote for change and political romanticism while youth reject it! People in Europe and the U.S. are waking up though mainstream media and governments endeavor to disregard them. UK membership in EU was just sacrificed to target Western governments and mainstream media. The people protest; since they were not recognized, they turned the table over in order to attract attention. 
The UK government lost its credibility since supporting Nigeria’s Buhari who killed thousands of people without a trial just like Omar al-Bashir; London lost its popularity since backing Saudi invasion of Yemen without listening to the voice of people. The media have diminished their trustworthiness by broadcasting materials against Iran meanwhile they never cover coverage Arab dictatorships from Bahrain to Saudi Arabia and from crimes against Gaza to Yemen. The votes of people in Britain were not only against British government and EU, it is also included the White House, IMF and ultra-conservative professors who have tried to jail science and specially International law by widespread rejection of anti-establishment articles. 
It is honorable that the system does not follow the wrong path of these governments; in addition, the neutral stance of the system and British members in particular toward Brexit referendum was appreciable. It is to be hoped that vote of protest in Britain could make British government and other Western States to redefine their behaviors toward their own nations and other nations. 
Politically, as all knows "change in European Union" has been a project of the system and Brexit is a success. In addition, the system is strongly aimed at taking over the Aramco and there is little time for it; meanwhile London is a competitor in this challenge. It seems that the Brexit would keep London away from this project and give the chance to the system to increase pressures against Riyadh to hand over Aramco. 
It should also be considered that the primary incentive of London for separating from EU based on this hypothesis that Britain would gain new political opportunists out of EU. And possibly achieving a position like what it had before Second World War, has put Washington and Beijing in the opposition camp. It is evident what made EU leaders to be concerned over Brexit is possible collapse of the Union. Needless to say, high risk of this option resulted in mutation of UK government over the subject in the middle of the way.