Shock Crisis

Crisis managing is the antidote of a crisis, which might be as a result of a shock unless the shock itself is a crisis. 
A political shock like mass resignation of a group of parliament's representatives can cause a radical but temporary effect against status quo, apart from leading to a political crisis. Crises are manageable but the very temporary radical effects can only be handled by time and patience. Now, if the number of imposing shocks against a state is more than its time capacity, the crisis of shock is formed. Parameters like the economy, population, demographics, culture, etc. determine the time capacity of a state so that an economic downfall of a state could negatively affect its time capacity. 
 It is predictable that the governments would try to resolve the crises due to shocks (such as diplomatic, economic crises, etc.), at the outset. Whereas, the governments would be suffering from lack of time over tackling the consequences and 'temporary radical effects' of the various and numerous shocks. Therefore, they would attempt to buy some time by resorting a kind of radicalism; in short, the good scenario would be something like Roosevelt's New Deal or positive shocks, while the bad scenario can end up with a version of McCarthyism or martial law. Needless to say that Tehran must be the target of this attack.