Immigration Crisis: Human Rights and Security

Entrance to the domestic issues of a country is not accepted based on the political ethics principle. The U.S. domestic issues are not exception. But some of the issues are set in the circle of Human Rights and security, needless to say, they are considered as the exceptions to the principle. 
The issue of Immigration Crisis (also called refugee crisis) in the United States is identified with both "Human Rights" and "Security" labels. Therefore, they must be addressed separately.

First: Human Rights 
The laws of the nationality, residence and immigration are linked to each other. And without considering the related parameters, i.e. rules of nationality and residence the unilateral changes in immigration law may cause a vicious cycle. But on the other hand, not updating these laws in the arena represents the neglect of legislators in a country that is considered as one of the major immigration countries and in the period that is known as Age of Communications. 
The laws in European countries, such as Germany, France and Finland are usually legislated by legal literature and technically. The exigency of codification about migration and its related parameters is undeniable and the legislators should pass the rules on the basis of this model framework. 

Second: Security 
Although the illegal entry of thousands unarmed children to America does not constitute a security threat to United Stated. But if this event is considered as a security test, therefore its result is certainly failure. After a few months of Immigration Crisis, the White House is unwilling to submit a bill about these issues to the congress in order to solve them and the congress does not put any bill on the agenda as well. So the system should take the initiative about both of the cases as soon as possible.