Russia Needs New Cold War!

The card is placed on the table by Catherine Ashton in her last trip to Iran, causes Russia sees its interests liable in danger in Iran. Also, their analysis shows a sign of concern of Russians from becoming reality the threat of sanctions against this country. Until now, Russians perceived that, gas form Iran rather than Russia`s will be replaced at western countries, in case of sanctions against Russia.
This threat causes Russia sees itself as a defeated in soft war. Russia intends to turn soft war into cold war by stimulating masses of Russians, emphasis on protection of Crimea`s Russian speaking and also sending word with this theme: Russia is in a state of readiness for cold war. Namely, that same action was done after losing out in soft war during the time of former Soviet Union. Russia has some privileges in cold war which misses them in soft war. In a cold war, Russia can easily enforce its militarist policies with protection of Russian`s masses and then create a militarist Fascism, while it can do none of them now. In other hand, Russian government has authorities that United States and European governments don't have. For example, assassinating intellectuals and critics of government is not so controversial in Russia. Even, Anna Politkovskaya who had American citizenship was not safe. While Noam Chomsky can easily publish his own books and teach at universities.
In Russia, a student is fired from university without any explanation only because of “inappropriate manner”, and is this the same in United States or Europe?!
Increasing power of Russian government by decreasing freedom equals to running choice of Russia in cold war. Thus Putin can resort to this new approach for continuance his power under the mask of cold war. But two distinctions can be assumed for United States in a cold war against Russia. First, it will be easier to destruction of Russian Fascism to the outbreak of cold war. In addition, Europeans and Americans haven`t known Russians perfectly yet, Therefore, it's easy to picture for minds which lack of any certain information. Second, White House can charge the president with its political defeats , such as Carter in Iran hostage crisis and another example George W. Bush in regard to attack to Iraq. But, Russian can't do that. Because, when terms of one president of republic is more than twice, so the mentioned president of republic will be symbol of Kremlin. It means that defeat of this president of republic is defeat of Kremlin, and of course not only defeat of the president of republic!
Now let's see, Putin can't be an independent politician.
The proof can be perceived by brief recalling from contemporary history of Russia.
Most of national resources in Russia privatized after Privatization during terms of Yeltsin presidency. But during the time of Soviet Union, few numbers of people piled up great wealth resulting their political corruption, and the rest were not rich and after falling Soviet Union, Russia experienced unpleasant happenings in economic field such as Russian financial crisis. So, winners of privatization in Russia were that few numbers who has called Oligarchy during the time of Soviet Union. They could increase their wealth in that term. In this manner, it is evident that Russian president of republic is needy and dependent to protection of plutocracy in Russia.
But, what is demand of Russian plutocracy?
Approximately, it can be said, their demands aren't very different with ones during the time of Soviet Union.
What will happen if they disappointed from Putin?!
And what will happen if is charged Putin's immature policies with defeat of Kremlin?!